social statistics version 20.0 (SPSS Inc)
90
Structured Review
SPSS Inc
social statistics version 20.0
Social Statistics Version 20.0, supplied by SPSS Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/social+statistics+version+20%2E0/version+20+0/pmc11794120-115-4-6
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Social Statistics Version 20.0, supplied by SPSS Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/social+statistics+version+20%2E0/version+20+0/pmc11794120-115-4-6
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
social statistics version 20.0 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
other:Article Title: Predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 and lipid profile in pre-eclampsia Article Snippet: The data collected were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics using Statistical Package for Social Statistics (SPSS), version 20.0. Article Title: The effect of the number of endometrial CD138+ cells on the pregnancy outcomes of infertile patients in the proliferative phase Article Snippet: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois (IL), USA) was adopted to perform all statistical analyses. Article Title: Comparison of two different electrotherapy methods in low back pain treatment Article Snippet: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of High Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in low back pain (LBP).. METHODS: Forty patients aged between 18 to 60 were included in this study.. The patients were randomized into two groups as TENS (Group I) and HILT (Group II). Article Title: Prognostic factors and real-life applicability of prognostic models for patients with bone metastases of carcinoma. Article Snippet: AUC values were interpreted as indiscriminate for 0.5 and lower, bad for 0.5-0.6, sufficient for 0.6-0.7, good for 0.7-0.8, very good for 0.8-0.9, and excellent for values higher than 0.9.17 Brier score is between 0 and 1; and lower scores are associated with better performances while a score more than 0.25 indicates the prediction as |